@Conspiracynut:
Don't bother apologizing, I don't mind. I think we've stumbled upon an interesting discussion here.
Well, consider how much bigger Kuma is. A fireflie's abomdomen is what, two milimeters long? And Kuma's laser could take up who-knows-how-much of his 15-meter build. Admittedly, when I made that parallel, I wasn't thinking about how Fireflies create next to no heat at all when lighting up, which is a technological fantasy. So let's focus exclusively on the light factor: Fireflies emit a light several times their own size in ALL DIRECTIONS. Kuma, however, focuses all his light in one direction that can probably go on for a couple of miles without going out.
So, while there are many more factors than I originally anticipated, what I said isn't really that far off.
Well, actually, the fart is visible with an infrared pair of goggles, so some part of the electromagnetic spectrum is reflected off of the fart. However, I must make a serious distinction between the firefly fart and Kuma's lazer.
For instance, the directionailty of the light emission is not bioluminescent but actually comprised of an extremely dense focused ray of radioactive emissions, whilst the firefly's butt is.
You don't seem to fully understand the differences. The firefly abdomen is certainly omnidirectional, but it is also much less powerful. If we assume that Kumas lasers can travel for at least two miles, and then consider the scale between the two subjects, then the firefly light should travel for at least twenty meters assuming that Kuma is 5 meters tall, whilst the firefly is 5cm long. The average firefly does not give an area of illumination of 4.5 meters, which assuming that the ray of light emitted from the laser is 1 meter wide and so would require an equivalent 1.0 lumina over a 4.5 meter circumference in between the frequencies of 460-700 hz to exact the same amount of energy necessary considering all the scalable factors exclusive to surface area and not taking into consideration the mass/surface area/volume ratio which would further complicate the calculations, and assuming that all other external factors are equal, insomuch the resistance of air is assumed to be vacuum and the speed of light in said vacuum is not equal to the speed of the lazer, thus decreasing the total energy given by the equation frequency x wavelength = speed in m/s, similar moisture and pressure conditions and equal impedance across both measured mediums.
Thus, after some calculations and given that the average circumference of the firefly's bioluminescent range is of approximately 10 centimetres in average, we can safely conclude that the proportional energy output of a firefly's fart and that of Kuma's laser is actually very dissimilar, having a difference of almost 2orders of magnitude, and thus making your affirmation demonstrably fallacious in nature.
So yes, I am afraid that the comparison with the firefly fart is, in conclusion, wrong.
LOL