< <tom: there="" are="" no="" blueprints="" for="" "pirate="" ships"="" in="" this="" day="" and="" age,="" franky!!<br="">If the sailors fly a skull-and-bones, it's a "pirate ship."
If they fly a seagull mark, it's a "marine ship."
I don't care what it is you want to make,
But a man must be proud
OF THE SHIPS HE BUILDS!!!!
It's a weapon only if it's used as a weapon. A warship can be a lot of things, including an ark, a vessel of protection… using it as a destructive weapon would be that person's choice.</tom:>
They aren't talking about Ancient Weapons here, and even if they were, they aren't saying that weapons are non-destructive, like arks. I'm pretty sure that nobody has ever even hinted that the Ancient Weapons are not extremely destructive by design.
And, since you're not convinced, Wolfpox, here:
< <cobra: there="" is="" no="" history="" of="" this="" country="" on="" that="" stone…!!="" it="" should="" have="" been<br="">everything about that "weapon" you wanted...!!
...and its LOCATION...
If you had told Crocodile that...
In that instant
this country would have been his. Am I wrong?
Cobra can't even read it and he knows.</cobra:>
I think Crocodile and Cobra were both guessing.
You're just someone who doesn't like me and doesn't want to agree with me, for whatever reason.
I guess it helps you to simplify it that much, but the truth is that I mostly like you and your theories, but I don't like the way you barge into a thread and hijack it for your own theory.