The fact that Huntress is going to be in a movie is never not going to be surreal.
DC Movies Thread - Shazam saves the day
-
-
New Shazam trailer
Still looking great!
-
Yes, continues to look good. Some of those look ''there is an actual cameramen holding the cam shots'' remind me of Hancock.
-
Yes, continues to look good. Some of those look ''there is an actual cameramen holding the cam shots'' remind me of Hancock.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that, could you clarify? Are you meaning that part of it is supposed to be like found footage style or like amateur filmmaker/home movies kind of shots?
-
I'm not quite sure what you mean by that, could you clarify? Are you meaning that part of it is supposed to be like found footage style or like amateur filmmaker/home movies kind of shots?
Yeah the slight shaky cam simulating somebody holding a camera.
-
Yeah the slight shaky cam simulating somebody holding a camera.
Sometimes it works, other times it's painfully awkward like a few of the scenes in The Hunger Games. I do kind of want a fully found footage superhero movie made of an established character or team but I don't know if it can be pulled off effectively the whole way through.
-
I'm absolutely seeing Shazam. Despite the positive things I heard of Aquaman, I still couldn't bring myself to see it. I just really dislike the direction the DCEU has been in for a while, and Aquaman just feels like a continuation of -at best- mediocrity.
What I like about Shazam is that it feels like it's own movie with it's town, yet very clearly is in the same universe as the other DC movies. Obviously Wonder Woman and Aquaman have references to the other movies in them to place them in the same context, but they feel(I'm just basing Aquaman off the promotional material and what I've heard) like Marvel Phase 1 movies…but after getting The Avengers. While they clearly are in the same universe, they set up and expand these individuals branches that will likely overtake the main tree. Given the presumed cast shake ups with Ben affleck and Henry Cavil, I doubt we're getting another Justice League film anytime soon. In addition to it's reception. And while I did enjoy Wonder Woman, it felt too self contained to be looked at as an "addition" to a specific DC universe on film.
Again, distinction between adding to a multi-film narrative, and being a good solo movie. Wonder Woman is that.
This is why I'm excited for Shazam. It looks fun, it looks unique, yet very clearly is taking place in a universe shaped by the preceding films.
It's kind of like Spider-Man Homecoming. We've seen how Spider-man can be handled in a context where he's (presumed to be) the only super hero in NYC. But an adaptation like that doesn't work in the context of a dozen films before it clearly setting up a decade of superhero activity, specifically in NY.
And to be clear, I'm not saying to just throw references in just for the sake of referencing. But Shazam feels so far like an actual addition to the overall DCEU. It's plot may not trickle down to other areas of the other films, but at least it seems to be relishing in telling it's own story in this 'verse. Wonder Woman, being a film taking place before the others, has an excuse for this. From what I've heard of Aquaman, it references the other films, but clearly focuses on Aquaman and Atlantis. As one of my friends said of it "You could take out any references to the other movies, and it would feel like it's own universe as a solo film".
-
lol. Slim Shady.
This trailer made me more interested. I'll see what the reviews say. Still not sure I like the guy they cast to play Adult Shazam.
-
Still haven't Wasn't super sold on Aquaman, so I didn't go out and see it. Might check it out when it's available on digital, but Shazam looks REALLY goddamn good.
Like, I'm legit actually Excited for a DC movie again and as a lifelong comic book fan, that's actually REALLY nice.
-
Still haven't Wasn't super sold on Aquaman, so I didn't go out and see it. Might check it out when it's available on digital, but Shazam looks REALLY goddamn good.
Like, I'm legit actually Excited for a DC movie again and as a lifelong comic book fan, that's actually REALLY nice.
My friends are having the exact opposite reaction to Shazam's trailers compared to Aquaman, which I did like (though their main complaint is they don't like the guy they got to play Shazam's look). I'm giving Shazam the benefit of the doubt but if I can't talk anyone into going with me, I'll wait for home video. I'll at least say that I like how Shazam looks really funny and the DCEU's problem has been the dark, soulless tone which has been gradually lightening up. They need to understand the COMIC part of comic book movies and I think it's dawning on them. Too little too late to save the DCEU as a whole but these characters are now able to be looked at well enough to do solid numbers at the box office so with a proper Kevin Feige type of supervisor over at WB, we might see a financially successful AND critically acclaimed DC Cinematic Universe yet.
-
Snip'd, look up to see it ^
The major problem with how WB is handling DC movies is sadly that Batman has been the only DC hero they've been able to consistently make high-earning movies with so somewhere along the line I think they got into their heads that things need to be dark, brooding, and "Realistic" for it to sell. That's why they got Nolan to produce Man of Steel.
They seem to FINALLY be learning that what works for Batman doesn't necessarily work for other DC characters.
I heard that Aquaman didn't take itself too seriously and Shazam looks like it's outright embracing the silliness of its premise. Things are looking up.
-
The major problem with how WB is handling DC movies is sadly that Batman has been the only DC hero they've been able to consistently make high-earning movies with so somewhere along the line I think they got into their heads that things need to be dark, brooding, and "Realistic" for it to sell. That's why they got Nolan to produce Man of Steel.
They seem to FINALLY be learning that what works for Batman doesn't necessarily work for other DC characters.
I heard that Aquaman didn't take itself too seriously and Shazam looks like it's outright embracing the silliness of its premise. Things are looking up.
Aquaman embraced the idea of what makes for a fun adventure, a quest. It did have its moments where it was like, holy crap, yeah, this is some serious shit going down right now, but it never dwelt on it for overly long enough to intrude on what made things more lighthearted. Getting that balance down is tricky but James Wan pulled it off.
Shazam seems to be going more the deep origin route, with the person learning to use their abilities throughout the course of the entire movie. Most superhero origins don't do that, the hero typically masters their power no later than halfway through the movie while it looks like Shazam is still figuring things out through the majority of it. I think Doctor Strange is probably the closest we've seen to that in the MCU so that's probably an apt comparison, especially since his abilities are also derived from magic and not science or technology.
Honestly, to think that Batman, the dark brooding loner, wouldn't need a more lighthearted foil in something like BvS, was a serious oversight. Even giving him a proper encounter with Flash or Aquaman would have been decent enough to offset that harsh dark tone but they didn't figure that out until Justice League and on top of having to cram 3 new character origins into it, them having had no time to develop a rapport beforehand just made more holes in that already sinking ship. They work better now and quite honestly if the DCEU had started with Wonder Woman and just been followed up with Aquaman, we'd be off to a great start before bringing in any of the other heroes, let alone forming the JL.
Batman would have benefited greatly from having a solo reboot, and being allowed to do what the Nolan movies didn't, and that is to unshackle itself from reasonable suspension of disbelief. Show us mutants, magic and ridiculously advanced technology we know it's a no-holds-barred Caped Crusader universe. Earn that senior citizen aged Bruce Wayne by showing us his early years building his rogues gallery before he became cynical enough to start killing (if that's an unavoidable directing choice which it shouldn't be).
Ultimately they need to operate under the philosophy that a character should be thrown into dark situations, not that they need to be made dark themselves. Marvel does this very well, and DC does in its comics and animation but not its live action adaptations for some reason. But things are turning around, as Aquaman definitely proved to be an example of not making the character dark but plunging him into some very dark situations.
-
I think I finally figured out what bugs me so much about Shazam. It's not the casting choices, it's not the humor, it's not even the costume itself, but it's those goddamn muscles. You can so obviously tell they're fake. Zachary Levi didn't have to get as buff as Thor, but why did they make them look like they're stuffed with cotton? And does he not have any abs?
-
There were talks about suicide squad 2 being a soft reboot etc. but it seems it will be a hard reboot.
"First of all, we don’t call it Suicide Squad 2 ‘cause it’s a total reboot, so it’s The Suicide Squad and I think people should be extremely excited about it. It’s everything you would hope from a James Gunn script and I think that says a lot and that promises a lot and I know that we will deliver a lot."
-
I just finished watching Batman Ninja, man what a whacky movie lol
-
I'm not familiar with Shazam comics so I don't know, based on trailers, is that really how Shazam normally is? because I can't get rid of the idea that its Freakazoid I'm looking at instead
-
I'm not familiar with Shazam comics so I don't know, based on trailers, is that really how Shazam normally is? because I can't get rid of the idea that its Freakazoid I'm looking at instead
Shazam you transform into the body of superman while having the mind of 10 year old.
The movie push the idea way more into the comedic but it's not that far off.
You should check out clash
-
The movie is being given a comedic rep (largely because I think DCU feels it needs to lighten up a bit). It's similar to Freakazoid, but different, as sometimes Dexter and Freakazoid would be two different identities. Billy Batson and Shazam are the same person. Only difference is that he's supposed to "gain the courage of Achilles", but that's it. The rest is just superpowers. No change in personality otherwise.
Unlike Freakazoid, the story can have a tragic or sad turn, as Billy's story focuses heavy on the grief of being an 'unwanted child' or a trouble maker in the eyes of the public (or in his own eye). Even sadder when Billy's closest friends (majority of them being kids) often get into danger, injury, or death.
I think one of my comic bits, which I almost wish they'd recreate for the movie, was a time when Superman (not knowing Shazam's true identity) confronted him after bad incident. It's really tragic when you see young Billy Batson being crushed by the weight of being a hero.
[hide]
[/hide] -
The movie is being given a comedic rep (largely because I think DCU feels it needs to lighten up a bit). It's similar to Freakazoid, but different, as sometimes Dexter and Freakazoid would be two different identities. Billy Batson and Shazam are the same person. Only difference is that he's supposed to "gain the courage of Achilles", but that's it. The rest is just superpowers. No change in personality otherwise.
Well he's supposed to have the Wisdom of Solomon so he's supposed to at least have adult-level intelligence but that's clearly not seen in the trailers. It doesn't really even seem like he's got the ability to behave maturely, so even if he did have the intelligence, he's not using it at all. Maybe he has to unlock each of those one at a time, like how he can't immediately fly even though he has that ability. So by the end, he'll start using that wisdom and that will be how he defeats the bad guy. Because unless one of those letters in Shazam is for 'Luck' (I know it's not one of them), he's not going to be able to win by chance unless something really cheap happens and I don't think audiences are going to want a repeat of something like Star-Lord's Dance Battle.
-
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/james-gunns-suicide-squad-movie-is-a-total-reboot-/1100-6465626/
Suicide Squad is getting a reboot.
Can the DC cinematic universe be even more of a clusterfuck? -
It is a clusterfuck. Especially since WW and Aquaman are still going strong, and there are rumors of Cavill returning to the Superman role. But also .. meh, don't care. Have 10 separate Jokers for all I care. Just create good, unique movies.
If I were making a Batman film I'd feel pretty stifled by having to follow these predefined universe rules.
-
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/james-gunns-suicide-squad-movie-is-a-total-reboot-/1100-6465626/
Suicide Squad is getting a reboot.
Can the DC cinematic universe be even more of a clusterfuck?getting a reboot after only 1 movie, gg DC
i mean Suicide Squad had problems but I would've wanted to see James Gunn try to make something better out of it. Although I'm sad we'll never get a Bataffleck vs. Leto Joker movie.
-
Wait a second. Polka-Dot Man? They are bringing Polka-Effing-Dot Man?! Why not bring Calendar Man as well?
-
Who gives an eff? I am tired of every studio wanting to do universes. Let them reboot what they want and just make good standalone movies going forward.
-
Not gonna lie. That Dark Universe they were thinking of doing it looked neat on paper.
-
Dark Universe shouldn't be sold as a universe, they should have tossed monster movies out and connect the good ones eventually. Playing openly was a bummer, it revealed it for the "let's eat marvel's cake scheme" that it is.
-
Wait a second. Polka-Dot Man? They are bringing Polka-Effing-Dot Man?! Why not bring Calendar Man as well?
I've heard of Calendar Girl, not Calendar Man…
Who gives an eff? I am tired of every studio wanting to do universes. Let them reboot what they want and just make good standalone movies going forward.
I disagree, with the caveat that they do them WELL. Otherwise yeah, they shouldn't bother.
Not gonna lie. That Dark Universe they were thinking of doing it looked neat on paper.
That was my first thought. Hell, if they had just kept going with the Brendan Fraser ones it might have been better. After all, setting it in modern times would mean everyone in those is dead so recasting wouldn't be an issue.
Dark Universe shouldn't be sold as a universe, they should have tossed monster movies out and connect the good ones eventually. Playing openly was a bummer, it revealed it for the "let's eat marvel's cake scheme" that it is.
Putting their best foot forward would have been the better option, like leaving Dr. Jekyll as an end-credits scene rather than a larger part of the Mummy. They got greedy like DC and didn't take the time to build up to something bigger like Marvel did instead of crafting an effective standalone narrative to build upon. Making the first movie a foundation for a shared universe instead of having a GOAL of a shared universe that integrates separate ones effectively, and THEN bringing them together, Avengers-style, once they've all been established, was a mistake on both DC and Dark Universe's part. They both stumbled at the starting line and it either killed their chances outright, or the ripple effect has polluted the entire universe.
I think if DC hadn't done it first and put such a bad taste in our mouths, the Dark Universe's failure might not have been quite as disappointing to audiences and soured the collective opinion on shared universes as a result.
-
Anybody know what happened to Batman Ninja? It's supposed to be on Netflix, but no matter how I search it never shows up. But from what I've googled it never left either. It's annoying!
-
-
Can someone please explain to me the first post credit scene in Shazam, with spoilers of course
EDIT: With spoiler tags is what I meant lol
-
Glad the early Shazam reviews are looking good! Just from the trailer I thought this would be a saving grace of the DCEU more than anything else, so I'm glad it's looking that way.
-
https://www.google.com/amp/s/heavy.com/entertainment/2019/03/shazam-post-credits-scene-after/amp/You
You can look up the character mentioned in the article.
-
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/shazam
Holy crap, what reviews! Guess I have to go see it.
-
Anybody know what happened to Batman Ninja? It's supposed to be on Netflix, but no matter how I search it never shows up. But from what I've googled it never left either. It's annoying!
I didn't like it very much. I'm more looking forward to Batman vs. TMNT.
Glad to hear Shazam is being warmly received, my friends don't want to see it with me unless I win free tickets again.
-
Zack Snyder really doing his best to ruin the positive Shazam news cycle.
-
Seriously. One of the better takes I've seen on his comments were "It's one thing if he came out and said "this is my interpretation of Batman'. Instead he's acting like "Hey fucking idiots, you don't know Batman massacres people"
And as others have pointed out, it seems like the only thing Zack likes about comics are the works of Frank Miller and Alan Moore.
Worth pointing out that in the entirety of TDKR, Batman doesn't kill anyone. The Joker's whole death scene is based on that principle.
I've seen people defending his comments by saying things like "Well what do you expect from the guy with guns on his tank driving through the streets"
Uhm….how about not having Batman have guns on his car.
I mean i love how his take on this is "well what do you expect". That's great if it's your headcanon for Batman, Zach. But people are complaining about YOUR vision of him.
I mean while Nolan's Batman did feats of similar destruction(though not to the same degree of going Kryptonian hunting and making murder weapons for it), at least Nolan through in the line of
"I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you".
That's as far as he should go. Even with Nolan's Batmobile and bike having guns on it, I think they only time it was used in a similar capacity to Snyder's was Catwoman killing Bane. And even then it took Batman out of it for a split second.
EDIT: Sidenote, saw Scott Snyder today. This is the 3rd time I've met him(We live in the same area). Proof that at least one person named Synder exists who REALLY gives a shit about Batman. All the times I've met him he's always been the nicest person and loves talking Batman and comics in general.
-
Seriously. One of the better takes I've seen on his comments were "It's one thing if he came out and said "this is my interpretation of Batman'. Instead he's acting like "Hey fucking idiots, you don't know Batman massacres people"
And as others have pointed out, it seems like the only thing Zack likes about comics are the works of Frank Miller and Alan Moore.
Worth pointing out that in the entirety of TDKR, Batman doesn't kill anyone. The Joker's whole death scene is based on that principle.
I've seen people defending his comments by saying things like "Well what do you expect from the guy with guns on his tank driving through the streets"
Uhm….how about not having Batman have guns on his car.
I mean i love how his take on this is "well what do you expect". That's great if it's your headcanon for Batman, Zach. But people are complaining about YOUR vision of him.
I mean while Nolan's Batman did feats of similar destruction(though not to the same degree of going Kryptonian hunting and making murder weapons for it), at least Nolan through in the line of
"I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you".
That's as far as he should go. Even with Nolan's Batmobile and bike having guns on it, I think they only time it was used in a similar capacity to Snyder's was Catwoman killing Bane. And even then it took Batman out of it for a split second.
EDIT: Sidenote, saw Scott Snyder today. This is the 3rd time I've met him(We live in the same area). Proof that at least one person named Synder exists who REALLY gives a shit about Batman. All the times I've met him he's always been the nicest person and loves talking Batman and comics in general.
The only thing I'll say to counter that is everyone forgets how many people Burton's Batman killed. Everyone acts like it was only Snyder who has done this and it's just not true.
And Bale did kill people….watch the vid below.
Burton Movies up to 1:37, Where was all the outrage for Burton? This was our first live action movie Batman! Our first Batman since Adam West!
also sidenote Burton's batmobile had guns….so did the Batwing....and missiles.
2nd Sidenote....Kilmer did kill people.
Now all that being said, even as a person who LOVES Man of Steel and will always defend that one, and liked BvS(ultimate cut). Even I am so sick of this. Zack...LET IT GO!!!! This is over, it's done. WB has moved on!!! I've moved on. No one cares anymore! This is just getting sad and pathetic on his part.
-
The only thing I'll say to counter that is everyone forgets how many people Burton's Batman killed. Everyone acts like it was only Snyder who has done this and it's just not true.
And Bale did kill people….watch the vid below.
Burton Movies up to 1:37, Where was all the outrage for Burton? This was our first live action movie Batman! Our first Batman since Adam West!
also sidenote Burton's batmobile had guns….so did the Batwing....and missiles.
2nd Sidenote....Kilmer did kill people.
Now all that being said, even as a person who LOVES Man of Steel and will always defend that one, and liked BvS(ultimate cut). Even I am so sick of this. Zack...LET IT GO!!!! This is over, it's done. WB has moved on!!! I've moved on. No one cares anymore! This is just getting sad and pathetic on his part.
Oh yeah! I mean don't get me wrong, various versions of Batman have killed on screen.
I mean the most specific moment in my mind comes from Burton's films.
But my problems with Snyder come specifically from his "Well what the fuck do you except from a psycho in a batsuit" mindset as compared to either justifying or adverting the case in his films.
Especially AFTER depcting a film in which SUPERMAN. CLARK KENT MASSACRES at LEAST thousands in his battle without bothering to point it out until a film 3 years later AFTER people critiqued the fact.
I honestly feel that if people didn't point out a controversy with Man of Steel, Synder wouldn't have even considered bringing up the plot point in Batman V Superman.
And all of that said I LOVE the opening scene of Batman V Superman.
My grandfather is an NYC Fireman who helped in and lost many friends in 9/11. One of my families closest friends, and firefighter named Billy mahoney was one of the three firefighters in that famous image of three firefighters holding the American Flag. That opening scene to Batman V Superman strikes INCREDIBLY close to home. It's handled perfectly and captures the mood it should.
And that's exactly why it escapes me that someone like Snyder can go from such PERFECT cinematography to "Well lets have Batman jump out of his car that just got bumped by Superman to threaten him".
Even IF he was going to straight up roll with the idea of "Batman murders people", he goes from "9-11 victim" to "I'ma try to murder this alien before I even know how to ".
But Synder rationalizes such dumb decisions under "Well what the fuck do you except".
I don't know what's dumber. This, or David Goyer's comments about Martian Manhunter. Like yeah, a merman who acts like a surfer and demi-god woman are believable. Martian that can shapeshift? THAT'S where we draw the line.
-
My co-worker just saw an advanced screening of Shazam and said he thought it was better than Wonder Woman. That's pretty high praise coming from a guy like him, based on our common interest in these movies, so I'm really hoping I can talk my friends who aren't that on board into seeing it with me now.
-
I honestly feel that if people didn't point out a controversy with Man of Steel, Synder wouldn't have even considered bringing up the plot point in Batman V Superman.
Maybe although we'd still have people criticizing the circumstances behind Batman's antagonism towards Superman and how they resolved the tension between them. And Doomsday just being thrown into the latter half of the film like his name is Harry Osborn:ninja:
-
I'm not a big fan of Batman being depicted as killing criminals, but I don't think it's that much of a problem either. I mean, I think it is a little hypocritical to criticize Snyder's version of Batman because of this when it's completely true that other incarnations of the Dark Knight killed people too without as much outrage. Burton's Batman was a complete psycho when it came to dealing with criminals, and even Nolan's version crossed the line here or there. And honestly, Batfleck really wasn't a big problem in BvS…I actually thought it was a pretty cool take on a very jaded, older Batman.
But I watched a video of the panel where Snyder made these remarks, and damn, this is incredibly condescending and rude off him. To tell fans who disagree with his version that they are "living in a fucking dreamworld" is just....who does he think he is? There are hundreds of artists that depicted their version of the Dark Knight over the years who stayed true to his no killing rule - I guess all of them were living in a dreamworld, too? It's so nice of Snyder to finally open our eyes to the fact that it is impossible to uphold your idealistic morals in this gritty, harsh world. But maybe someone should also open his eyes to the fact that Batman is a comic book character and not a real person living in the real world. There also are no Kryptonic monsters or all-powerful flying aliens in blue spandex, but I guess these fantasy elements are still more realistic than a superhero that actually doesn't murder people left and right in Snyder's eyes. It's also painful to listen to him talk, he seems to be outright unable to fully form a sentence or a coherent point.
-
My co-worker and I just had a revelation. It seems only the films that omit Batman and Superman in the DCEU have been really positively received. How ironic that the two headliners' involvement seems to be the common thread among all the ones that failed to truly capture the collective hearts of their audiences or impress critics. Anything more substantial than Batman's appearance in Suicide Squad seems to be a bad omen for the films. Maybe move up the Flashpoint movie so the reboot can fix those guys' bad luck streak.
-
Well to be fair Wonder Woman and Aquaman don't have a shit ton of media properties to their name so that helps at least.
Aquaman though kind of needed the rub though given how Superfriends made him a joke.
-
I don't mind Batman or other heroes killing. I think it just has to make sense. Is a criminal about to shoot him in the head? Yeah, go ahead and kill him. Is a criminal about to endanger the life of an innocent? Go ahead and kill the criminal. Snyder just sounds like a broken man or at the very least a massive troll.
-
Yes but don't make a fuss when you turn a no-kill hero into a murderer with just a handwave. We know that cap America, wonder woman, wolverine are people who kill a lot, but there are a ton of heroes that do their best to not kill anyone, besides the big two, Spiderman comes to mind. I guess flash has a small kill sheet as well.
Sure, you can make a take of them being ok with killing, but be aware that you are changing a core part of a character, and doing that without reason, like now Spiderman has the web launchers as a power! ( To make him more mundane), you can argue stuff like that for the Snider changes, like Superman being more careful with his no kill rule because he failed to uphold it before, or Batman growing despair leading him to seek more permanent means of killing, as if he killed the joker when he could, then Jason wouldn't had to die.
Use your changes to tell something.
-
I have issue with Batman killing, but I can live with Batman killing.
What I do take GREATER issue with is Batman having a Dick Cheney logic as to why we should kill Superman, Batman branding criminals who end up getting murdered in prison for said brand, Jesse "Fozzie Bear" Eisenberg blowing up a building full of innocent people (AND MERCY) after we are forced to take a cup of piss seriously, and a cast of completely awful people that I can't begin to care about because they destroy more than they save.
Even if I were to spend an entire day going on a tangent as to why Batman shouldn't kill, it doesn't change the fact that I hate the very essence and core of the film without hesitation. It is a long, LONG lifeless husk of a movie that drains your soul and never ends. If Snyder wants to whip at the fanbase and act like he knows Batman better than them, he can play with that fire all he wants. Batman killing or not, it doesn't change the problems this movie has.
That said, I recently saw Aquaman. It was way better than I thought it was going to be. And I am super excited to see Shazam. If anything. BvS has led us to a DCU era where characters who I never imagined would get awesome movies are now getting awesome movies. And I am fucking here for it.
-
Doesn't taking a non-lethal approach to crimefighting completely change the dynamic of how one operates? Batman having to hold back and not go for any killing blow, and going out of his way to rescue the idiots from dying by their own devices as they attempt and fail to use them on him, that's the kind of thing that impresses me a lot more seeing him in action because it's an additional level of difficulty or handicap and yet we know we can count on him to rise to the challenge not to rack up a body count, even if he's not directly responsible for the deaths himself. I'm pretty okay with him going the "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you either" route from Batman Begins where he lets Ra's Al Ghul go down with the train, but I'd expect that primarily from only the final battle against the main villain.
-
The only thing that I like about Batman killing people in this version is the meme with Christian Bale's Batman saying "if you kill a murderer there's still the same amount of murderes in the world" and Ben Afleck's Batman below him saying "what if I kill a whole bunch" with a big grin on his face
-
Shazam joined the bulk of superhero movies where the hero gets smacked against a cop car.
-
The only thing that I like about Batman killing people in this version is the meme with Christian Bale's Batman saying "if you kill a murderer there's still the same amount of murderes in the world" and Ben Afleck's Batman below him saying "what if I kill a whole bunch" with a big grin on his face
That's uhm…. that's actually a Punisher quote. That the meme stole.