So, no one wants to give me the gun? I"d make a good Mayor.
@Vepe:
@ laserbeak - I meant by not be taken seriously, that I am not an experienced player and I don't know all the aspects of the game. So I know that I can be wrong and when people are aware of that, I'm more trusting to let my ideas out for people to make their own. Though if I happen to be right, it would be pretty awesome XD I hope I make sense.
Please don't play the "I am not an experienced player" card. This isn't your first time playing. In my eyes, everyone becomes experienced after finishing a game. Will you know every single role? No. But, you'll know the basics.
@MagiciteKefka:
Actually, i can say that. I have proof.
Do i feel like presenting them now? No, i can't. Just trust me.
Is Vepe your partner? You shouldn't say stuff like that and tell us to trust you. We don't.
@TheMidnightRift:
I'm not taking anything seriously, and I'm far less calm than you are, LOL
Wait a second, I get what you mean now, when I said "I am the only one without a partner", I didn't mean it in the literal way, I admit rereading it, it sounds suspicious, I just meant I was the only one who did reveal that he has no partner, sorry about that.
…Derp, the fact is, this is how the conversation went:
"Oh, come on, you didn't notice hints that there were other people without partners"
"No, dude, I didn't notice"
"Seriously, IT WAS AN ENTIRE CONVERSATION"
"What conversation?"
"The conversation between me and you, where we discussed revealing partners"
"Yeah, but no one hinted at other people not having partners"
"Wait, what? What are you talking about?"
You're entirely at fault here, you're confusing me and yourself
I think you just have a gut feeling on me and you are contriving to get me lynched, either that, or you're scum and you want me gone
Yep, if you go reread, you'l notice I said "I don't have a partner", Vorlianis said "This is what I was fearing" and then I said "Ok, good, anyone else who doesn't have a partner, don't claim". The entire logic is that I was afraid of Mafia getting people that don't have partners (that might have stronger powers), thus, I claimed I didn't have any partner to give you the idea there were those without partners, so you would change your mind about everyone claiming partnerships.
So, basically, the way I saw it at the time:
If I didn't claim:
Kmohyudin: WHO HAS PARTNERS
Crowd: Me, me, me, me
Kmohyudin: What about you, Vorlianis, SGRaaize, Mastello and Harvady?
Vorlianis: Erm... I just got no partner
Mastello: Yeah... awkward
SGRaaize: Derp derp
Kmohyudin: SCUM
SGRaaize is lynched
Mafia 1: We kill the unpartnered guys first, they must have better powers"
Mastello dies
Kmohyudin: Oh shit
If I claimed
SGRaaize: WAIT, I HAVE NO PARTNERS
Kmohyudin: Hmm, there are those without partners, eh? Fine
Mafia kills me, but you don't try to get the unpartnered users found out, and thus the Mafia shoots at random
I was definately not expecting you to suspect me based on that
Erm, yes... That's what I mean, I revealed cause I thought Mafia would kill unpartnered people, and then I found out about the cult.
I have no idea what you're talking about, also, a second ago, you were arguing that she didn't doubt the cult, you see what i mean? You're always changing your arguments, you're clearly tunneling on me.
It was, before
The merit is simple, she's being fluffy, completely different from the last game where she was townie, not leading, quiet, and she doubted the Cult with no decent reasoning.
Long post. Noted for my personal reference.
@TheMidnightRift:
2 Hidden members, Interesting
Oh, I'm trying to keep track of that! Watch your back, ninjas.
@SomebodyUDon'tKnow:
Vote: No Lynch I think that we're rushing into things without knowing anything about said things eg trying to lynch someone we think might me a non townie, when they may be townie and we've just lowered our numbers against ourselves, giving the Mafia/cult/both more chance of winning.
Are you talking about the Lynch Vote or the Gun Vote?
@Harvady:
You could say the same about anyone. There are half-a-dozen players who are pushing for lynches while contradicting themselves, misquoting other players, and basically defaming arguments without explaining themselves.
I'd ask why the town let's them get away with it, but they consist of all the players who are on the same relative wagon.
You may be right, but I hold certain people to a higher expectation than others. Those are the ones I focus on. That's why I want Bogart gone. He is a smart player who I think isn't helping the town as well as I think he can.
You are a riot. We have to trust someone who wagons and abstains from helping the town, and not the person who actually gave proof of township.
No. You do not get to make that argument. There are twenty-two players left. Unless you make a point to interrogate them all, get them all to reveal, you do not waste time pushing Vepe with that weak of a case.
I don't agree. You can't interrogate everyone at the same time. You look through, find something someone posted that doesn't add up and look into it. If your instincts pan out, great. If not, move on.
I, for example, do that and try to make notes on everything (and everyone) that doesn't sit well with me to look back on later.
@Harvady:
You don't need to put up a vote to throw town off the track. Accusations and suspicions should be taken seriously. If you're just naming the inactives and neutral, you're just pointing out the obvious.
We all know who hasn't been saying anything. You don't need to point it out until you're willing to push for the lynch.
What is so wrong with asking a question? That a very important part of the game.
Also, some people (like myself) do like reminders. I don't have to take it at face value. I'll check it out myself and make my own conclusion. There is a lot if info to go though and some things (and people) slip through the cracks.